Gut–Brain Axis and Stress Physiology: Linking Microbiome Diversity with Behavioral Adaptations in Captive and Free-Ranging Mammals

Authors

  • Muhammad Sajid Department of Zoology University of Sindh Author
  • Ahmed Physical Education Department. University: Sukkur IBA University. Author
  • Asghar Ali Physical Education Department. University: IBA sukkur Author
  • Ali raza Sukkur Iba university Physical education and sports science Author
  • Hafiz Muhammad Talha Department: Molecular Biotechnology (Biotechnology, pharmaceutical and veterinary) University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.62497/ijrab.188

Keywords:

Gut–brain axis, microbiome diversity, stress physiology, behavioral adaptation, captivity, free-ranging mammals.

Abstract

Background: Stress physiology and behavior are influenced by the gut–brain axis, a bidirectional communication network that connects the central nervous system with the gastrointestinal bacteria.  Environmental factors, especially in captivity, may change the richness of microbiomes, which may have an impact on animals' stress reactions and adaptive behaviors.

Objective: This study aimed to investigate how gut microbiome diversity influences stress physiology and behavioral adaptations by comparing captive and free-ranging Rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta) and Indian crested porcupines (Hystrix indica).

Methodology: A 12-month longitudinal comparison research was carried out on 40 individuals from both species (20 in captivity and 20 in the wild).  Fecal samples (n = 480) were taken every month for glucocorticoid assay and 16S rRNA sequencing.  Stereotyping, exploration, social interactions, eating, grooming, and mobility were all evaluated by weekly behavioral observations utilizing species-specific ethograms.  Microbial richness and composition were measured using alpha- and beta-diversity measurements, and statistical analyses included correlations, multivariate regressions, redundancy analysis, and mixed-effects models.

Results: Free-ranging mammals exhibited significantly higher gut microbiome diversity than captive animals (Shannon index: macaques 4.12 ± 0.18 vs. 3.45 ± 0.21, porcupines 3.85 ± 0.20 vs. 2.98 ± 0.19; p < 0.001). Captive individuals had elevated cortisol levels (macaques 28.5 ± 3.2 vs. 18.2 ± 2.7 ng/mL; porcupines 22.7 ± 2.9 vs. 14.5 ± 2.4 ng/mL; p < 0.01) and displayed more stereotypic behaviors and reduced exploration and social interactions. Microbiome diversity negatively correlated with cortisol and stereotypy but positively with exploration (p < 0.01). Regression and mixed-effects models confirmed that microbiome diversity and stress levels were significant predictors of behavioral outcomes.

Conclusion: Gut microbiome diversity is a key determinant of stress physiology and behavioral adaptability in mammals. Captivity reduces microbial richness, increases stress, and constrains natural behaviors, highlighting the need for enriched environments and dietary management to promote welfare.

Author Biographies

  • Muhammad Sajid, Department of Zoology University of Sindh

    Department of Zoology

    University of Sindh

  • Ahmed, Physical Education Department. University: Sukkur IBA University.

    Physical Education Department.

    University: Sukkur IBA University.

  • Asghar Ali , Physical Education Department. University: IBA sukkur

    Physical Education Department.

    University: IBA sukkur

  • Ali raza, Sukkur Iba university Physical education and sports science

    Sukkur Iba university

    Physical education and sports science

  • Hafiz Muhammad Talha, Department: Molecular Biotechnology (Biotechnology, pharmaceutical and veterinary) University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

    Department: Molecular Biotechnology (Biotechnology, pharmaceutical and veterinary)

    University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli

References

Morais LH, Schreiber IV HL, Mazmanian SK. The gut microbiota–brain axis in behaviour and brain disorders. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2021 Apr;19(4):241-55. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-020-00460-0.

Arneth BM. Gut–brain axis biochemical signalling from the gastrointestinal tract to the central nervous system: gut dysbiosis and altered brain function. Postgraduate medical journal. 2018 Aug;94(1114):446-52. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135424.

Wiley NC, Dinan TG, Ross RP, Stanton C, Clarke G, Cryan JF. The microbiota-gut-brain axis as a key regulator of neural function and the stress response: Implications for human and animal health. Journal of animal science. 2017 Jul 1;95(7):3225-46. https://doi.org/10.2527/jas.2016.1256.

Rusch JA, Layden BT, Dugas LR. Signalling cognition: the gut microbiota and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. Frontiers in endocrinology. 2023 Jun 19;14:1130689. https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2023.1130689.

Koziol A, Odriozola I, Leonard A, Eisenhofer R, San José C, Aizpurua O, Alberdi A. Mammals show distinct functional gut microbiome dynamics to identical series of environmental stressors. MBio. 2023 Oct 31;14(5):e01606-23. https://doi.org/10.1128/mbio.01606-23.

Tan YS, Zhang RK, Liu ZH, Li BZ, Yuan YJ. Microbial adaptation to enhance stress tolerance. Frontiers in Microbiology. 2022 Apr 27;13:888746. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2022.888746.

Price EE, Stoinski TS. Group size: Determinants in the wild and implications for the captive housing of wild mammals in zoos. Applied Animal Behaviour Science. 2007 Mar 20;103(3-4):255-64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2006.05.021.

Karl JP, Hatch AM, Arcidiacono SM, Pearce SC, Pantoja-Feliciano IG, Doherty LA, Soares JW. Effects of psychological, environmental and physical stressors on the gut microbiota. Frontiers in microbiology. 2018 Sep 11;9:2013. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.02013.

Wasimuddin, Menke S, Melzheimer J, Thalwitzer S, Heinrich S, Wachter B, Sommer S. Gut microbiomes of free‐ranging and captive Namibian cheetahs: Diversity, putative functions and occurrence of potential pathogens. Molecular ecology. 2017 Oct;26(20):5515-27. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.14278.

Kodidala SR, Kaur H, Manjunath S, Akula GR. Unraveling the intricacies of the gut-brain axis: from physiology to psychology and obesity. Сибирский научный медицинский журнал. 2024;44(5):19-23. DOI: 10.18699/SSMJ20240502

Mbiydzenyuy NE, Hemmings SM, Shabangu TW, Qulu-Appiah L. Exploring the influence of stress on aggressive behavior and sexual function: Role of neuromodulator pathways and epigenetics. Heliyon. 2024 Mar 15;10(5). DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27501

Davidson GL, Cooke AC, Johnson CN, Quinn JL. The gut microbiome as a driver of individual variation in cognition and functional behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2018 Sep 26;373(1756):20170286. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2017.0286.

McKenzie VJ, Song SJ, Delsuc F, Prest TL, Oliverio AM, Korpita TM, Alexiev A, Amato KR, Metcalf JL, Kowalewski M, Avenant NL. The effects of captivity on the mammalian gut microbiome. Integrative and comparative biology. 2017 Oct 1;57(4):690-704. https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/icx090.

Deng Y, Zhou M, Wang J, Yao J, Yu J, Liu W. Involvement of the microbiota-gut-brain axis in chronic restraint stress: disturbances of the kynurenine metabolic pathway in both the gut and brain. Gut Microbes. 2021; 13 (1): 1–16. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1997;134(4):387-91. doi: 10.1080/19490976.2020.1869501.

Xia M, Xia Y, Sun Y, Wang J, Lu J, Wang X, Xia D, Xu X, Sun B. Gut microbiome is associated with personality traits of free-ranging Tibetan macaques (Macaca thibetana). Frontiers in Microbiology. 2024 Apr 22;15:1381372. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2024.1381372

Kraimi N, Dawkins M, Gebhardt-Henrich SG, Velge P, Rychlik I, Volf J, Creach P, Smith A, Colles F, Leterrier C. Influence of the microbiota-gut-brain axis on behavior and welfare in farm animals: A review. Physiology & behavior. 2019 Oct 15;210:112658. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112658.

MacLeod KJ, Kohl KD, Trevelline BK, Langkilde T. Context‐dependent effects of glucocorticoids on the lizard gut microbiome. Molecular ecology. 2022 Jan;31(1):185-96. https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.16229

Abstract Views: 6
PDF Downloads: 0

Published

2024-03-03

Issue

Section

Articles