Post-Publication Discussion Policy
IRABCS recognizes that scientific communication continues after publication. Constructive discussion, critical evaluation, and responsible scientific debate contribute to the advancement of knowledge.
The journal encourages readers and researchers to communicate scientifically valid concerns, comments, corrections, or additional information related to published articles.
Reader Comments and Scientific Feedback
Readers may contact the editorial office regarding:
- Possible errors.
- Methodological concerns.
- Ethical issues.
- Additional scientific information.
- Clarifications related to published findings.
Comments should be evidence-based, respectful, and focused on scientific issues.
Editorial Evaluation of Post-Publication Concerns
The editorial team evaluates post-publication concerns according to scientific validity, relevance, and ethical considerations.
Depending on the nature of the concern, the journal may:
- Request clarification from authors.
- Publish a correction.
- Issue an expression of concern.
- Initiate retraction procedures.
- Publish additional editorial communication.
Author Response
When appropriate, authors may be invited to respond to scientific concerns raised after publication.
Author responses are evaluated for relevance, professionalism, and contribution to scientific discussion.
Maintaining the Scholarly Record
Post-publication discussions are managed in a manner that preserves transparency while protecting the integrity and reliability of published research.
